After reading through and watching videos from this semester, I learned that one of the reasons schools are still segregated goes back to the 1900s when suburbs and metropolitan areas were segregated through federal, state, and local policies. I was surprised that realtors and those in charge were able to get away with this blatant segregation, even after the abolishment of slavery. I had not previously known about redlining, or maybe I learned it a long time ago and forgot. But I was shocked that these policies were allowed to be implemented. Redlining is the process of denying someone a home loan based on their race. This meant that people of color had a much harder time acquiring property, as they could not get loans. White people were able to acquire 98% of home loans and use this access to property to overtime generate more wealth. The government would also separate housing authorities, and give white people the best properties for these projects and people of color the worst area...
When asked this question at the beginning of the module, I would have liked to think nothing right? The amount of money a person has shouldn't have to do with the kind of education their child is receiving. After reading more into this module, I realize this is not the case. Almost half of the funding for schools in the United States comes from local property taxes. This makes for a large difference between wealthy and poor communities. These differences can be seen among states, among school districts within a state, and even among schools in a district. Many people are aware of these inequalities within school funding but tolerate them. According to “Unequal School,” the reasons people tolerate this because of 3 factors, historical factors relating to how public schools have always “been viewed as institutions that serve their local communities,” flawed studies saying that “levels of funding do not affect student achievement,” and beliefs about the causes of poverty. These beli...